Ascension of Vortigern

 

The Roman historian Zosimus wrote:

Historia Nova, Book VI.5.2-3
The barbarians above the Rhine, assaulting without hindrance, reduced the inhabitants of Britain and some of the Celtic peoples to defecting from the Roman rule and living their own lives, independent from the Roman laws. The Britons therefore took up arms and, braving the danger on their own behalf, freed their cities from the barbarian threat. And all Armorica [Brittany] and the other Gallic provinces followed their example, freed themselves in the same way, expelling the Roman officials and setting up a constitution such as they pleased.

Zosimus indirectly confirms the presence of two people in Britain: the Britanni (Proto-English families) and 'some Celtic people', also in Britain, probably some Proto-Welsh families in Hampshire, who lived close to the old language border. Both clearly organized their own defence and no longer counted upon Rome. Anglo-Saxons were at this stage not needed. Gildas gives us a similar story.

Probably in 425 Vortigern was chosen ‘overlord’ or ‘upper lord’ of the council [1] in London. His modern title would be 'chairman'. The French word is president .

He must have been at that moment around 39 years old. He was of course a member of a powerful family, probably the Vitalinus family. The ancestry of his family is documented in the Historia Britonum.

My estimation is that he was born around 386. Around 407, he married Sevira, the second daughter of Maximus Magnus, who had been co-emperor for 5 years. The date of the marriage is derived from the birth date of Sevira: about 20 years earlier. The fact that Maximus had 2 very young daughters before his death in 388, is attested. I simply suppose that young Vortigern and Sevira had a similar age. Most upper-class marriages at the time were arranged. It was about politics and money. Love was not important. They married during the years of Constantine III, co-emperor and alleged British usurper.

Vortigern remained the leader of the British senate for some 20 years (425 - ±445). He would die in (modern) Wales around 447-452 (a few years after the great rebellion) at an estimated age of 61-68, probably in the neighbourhood of his birthplace.

The birth date and subsequent dates in Vortigern's life are a reconstruction. They are partly based upon the mention on the (click) Pillar of Eliseg, mentioning his marriage with Sevira. There are many reasons to believe that this message is genuine. The pillar was erected during the early 9th century. At that time a king was a king solely because of his male ancestors. Referring to a female ancestor (Sevira) was pointless. There are no indications that Sevira ever had become important. Maximus had indeed daughters. Other sources attest this. Their names were however not mentioned but the one on the pillar. He also had a son, Flavius Victor. Referring to him would have been more in line with the tradition that only male ancestors were important. In reality Flavius Victor died too young, but the question is wether people knew that in the 9th century. Strange enough, the pillar was meant to honor the Welsh dynasty of Powys. As Vortigern was considered to be traitor to the Welsh cause by Gildas and Bede, his name upon a Welsh pillar is rather surprising. Hence my believe that the text onto the pillar is authentic.

A consequence is also that the date 425 (Nennius' Historia Britonum) for the ascension of Vortigern is more likely than 446 (Bede's date). I feel that becoming chairman of the British senate at an age of ±39 is very plausible. Bede's date would have made him about 62 years old. Although possible, it would have made him a very old man for the time. It's much less in line with all the tales we know about Vortigern e.g. the incest slur. The question also can be raised whether the British senate would have chosen such an old man to lead Britain in those difficult times.

The name Vitalinus is a strong indication that he was a member of the proto-English upper-class in Britain . In Welsh, the name is written Guithelin or similar, although the texts in Welsh appeared later. We can apply here the comparison with the first name ‘William’. William is the modern version of Wilhelm. This name was transformed in French into Guillaume. The conversion of ‘wi’ into ‘gui’ in the (para-)Brythonic languages is something like a rule. Applying this rule backwards upon Guithelin gives us Witelin(g) in its original language. ‘Wite’ is in modern English 'white' and refers to the colour of one’s hair. ‘–ling’ means ‘related to’ or ‘family’. One ancestor of this family must have had white hair, most probably when he was young. Names like ‘De Witte’ or ‘Weissman’ are common in the Dutch language group or in Germany. Witheling is therefore far from an exceptional name, in all the German-like languages. This is the clue that the family was of eastern-Briton origin. It is at the same time an indication that at least a part of Britain spoke a German-like language. I reject the idea that the family issued from German immigrants. The very base of the wealth of the family was like everywhere else in the Empire agricultural. Such a base is not easily acquired. In most cases, the owners of the land were natives. A translation or adaptation in Latin (Vitalinus) meant often an embellishment of the original name. White in Latin is alba. The name Witheling could have been translated into Albanus or similar. The choice for Vitalinus is not the result of a poor knowledge of the Latin language. Even in Latin, the family referred to its proto-English character.

Like most of the important families at the time, the Vitalinus family must have possessed vast agricultural exploitations all over Britain. Later events let us believe that the family had land in south-Wales or neighbourhood, although the real power base and propriety must be situated in Wessex, today Oxfordshire and a part of Berkshire. This region was probably Welsh territory during the Bronze Age. Vortigern was probably born in proto-Wales [2]. It’s there that the young Vortigern grew up. As a member of a proto-English family he must have spoken proto-English with his parents, and as a young boy he must have picked up the proto-Welsh language from his local friends. At school he learned to read and write in Latin.

The picture emerging from the sources depicts him as an intelligent and well-educated man. He probably made an exemplary carrier in the Brito-Roman administration and was therefore appointed as the head of his family. This position enabled him to become some sort of ‘chairman’ of the council. He was and remained the man of the central government.

He adopted a Welsh honorific name. Gwr-teyrn: Gor is Brythonic (Welsh) for ‘over’, 'upper' and teyrn means 'leader', 'important man', not 'tyrant'! In those days 'teyrn' had no connotation about rank. Any leader was called 'teyrn', even the most low ranking ones. In the council there was however a small problem: all its members were 'teyrn'. So, Vortigern was called 'upper-leader', 'chairman', which is not the same as 'high-king' or 'overlord'. A royal or high ranking aristocratic ascent was not implied. This qualification became soon his name. Gildas would later use the similarity between 'teyrn' and the Latin 'tyrannus' to mock with the man.

The classic tradition dictated that 'Vortigern' should have adopted a honorific Latin name, as Maximus Clemens Magnus did. 'Welsh' was certainly associated with 'pro-Roman'. A classic Latin honorific name would have put him on the pro-Roman side. A Welsh name can be considerated as a gesture toward the moderate Welsh. Many moderate Welsh lived in the Northwest of modern England. It was important to keep them on the side of the majority, or they were necessary to obtain a majority in the council. The name Vortigern was like himself: a compromise. It is possible that 'Vortigern' Vitalinus was the first to have this honorific name and that he had successors who adopted the same ‘title’.

Vortigern got the difficult task to appease trouble in the council. To summarize the problems:

( 1) the question whether Britain was still a part of the Roman Empire or not was not solved. The majority of the council members fancied the Empire, a growing minority rejected it.
(2) The Welsh wanted to get rid of the 'Anglo-Saxon rule' = the way eastern lords ruled, consolidated and expanded their power by using Anglo-Saxon guardsmen. Only a central led army was a legal army, the Welsh opposition argued. Most east-British lords regarded their 'Saxon' solution to be just temporary.
(3) The authority of the British senate had to be restored, but some eastern lords saw no advantage there. So Vortigern faced opposition from west and east.

The 'Anglo-Saxon rule' proved to be too successful. So much that more and more 'Anglo-Saxons' were lured into Britain. None of this was officially organized or even legal. Which eventually led to some sort of degradation of the quality of those soldiers. Too much young, untrained, inexperienced Germans presented themselves in eastern Britain. The local authorities noticed the trend and urged 'London' to take measures.

Vortigern would become famous for he was the ruler who 'invited' the ‘Anglo-Saxons’ into Britain.