Frequently Asked Questions and politics
The name of the correspondent has
been changed.
-----Original Message-----
From: John D.
Sent: May 5 2008 19:51
To: Michael
Subject: Fascinating
Great site, I look forward to reading in greater detail... I read
a book a couple of years ago which argued that English was an
indigenous rather than immigrant language and that the "Celtic" areas,
far from being indigenes themselves, were the result of colonization
from Iberia. This was argued on Occam's razor and while it
jarred wildly with my understanding of English history, the more I
thought about it the more plausible it seemed. So began an
intellectual journey for which you have provided an admirable roadmap.
This of course, especially with the current status quo of voting
manipulation laughing called devolution policy in the UK, is likely to
become political dynamite in the next 5 years or so. Much Celtic
nationalism is predicated on the notion that the English are squatters
on Celtic territory - one Cornish nationalist of my acquaintance used
to habitually refer to me and other English people as "Germans".
I ought to send him a link to your site, might open his mind a little.
Once again, many thanks for some intriguing work.
John D.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael
To: John D.
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Fascinating
Dear Jason,
Thanks for your encouraging letter.
I announce to you that I will add a section 'F.A.Q.' on the
website. Some people think that I'm some sort ultra-nationalist,
if not a Nazi, emphasizing 'pure blood' and , why not, honour. I deny
this with utmost vehemency. English is indeed an indigenous language,
just like Brythonic is indigenous. English belongs to the German
language group, but was even in Antiquity different enough from (high)
German. It's striking how easily people attach some moral conclusions
to the alleged fact that English would be German. What is better?
Imported German or indigenous German? Such questions are
preposterous. It was all about discovering the truth. English was there
all the time and that's for me a scientific fact. I refuse
any moral implication. No people is white and innocent as snow.
Neither is the opposite. Discovering the real background of a
population does by no means imply some sort of superiority. 'Rights'
can not be derived from that.
The fear that this paper could be used by extreme rightwing
hooligans cannot justify the dismissal of it. Historic science has
been abused by politicians since it exists. History was often bend and
rewritten according to political needs. This happened in all
countries world wide. What a shame for the historians who lent
themselves to such schemes.
Greetings,
Michael G.
----Original Message-----
From: John D.
Sent: May 6 2008 21:08
To: Michael
Subject: Re: Fascinating
Dear Michael
Thanks for the reply, a FAQ section is a good idea because you can be
sure that Celtic nationalists and British Labour Party supporters will
attack this theory on several fronts. An interesting
programme around 5-6 years ago on Channel 4 suggested problems with
genetic evidence, in that a dig of a hall from Dark age
Yorkshire showed that the people found in a local graveyard were a
mixture of locals and immigrants from northern Germany, but that
the
low status skeletons were the immigrants and the high status ones
were local, this at a time when the Anglo-Saxons were supposedly taking
over from the indigenous population and exterminating them.
The
presenter didn't elaborate, more or less throwing it in as a last
minute hand grenade before the closing titles, leaving the viewer with
the suggestion that history may not have been quite as it has been
handed down to us. Interesting that Celts use "German" as an
insult against the English. My father is Scottish and I have
Irish blood on my mother's side but if my Celtic cousins want to call
me a German I have no problem with that. Even if it is less true
than they believe it to be :-) I am a firm opponent of politicized
science, I just like to know what the truth is. People who
advocate suppression of scientific facts for political reasons are in a
sorry club, along with the likes of Trofim Lysenko, Alfred Rosenberg
and the American evangelists. But if English people seeking
to redress the political imbalance in the UK can use this to
deflect political calumny from "the nations" I don't
necessarily oppose it on those grounds.
I look forward to seeing further developments
Yours,
John
----Original Message-----
From: Michael
Sent: May 6 2008 21:08
To: John D.
Subject: Re: Fascinating
Dear John,
Your information about the Yorkshire graves is highly interesting. I
was unaware of that find. But it would fit the predictions one can
derive from the website text. I clearly stated the most of the old
(east) British upper-class firmly remained in power, thanks to the help
of the Anglo-Saxon soldiers. Most native Anglo-Saxons remained what
they previously were in North-Germany: a warrior class, a buffer
between rich and poor. I'll investigate that information.
Many thanks, love it.
Michael.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
end
of messages <<<<
After an inquiry I found that these
early Anglo-Saxon graves could indeed confirm my hypothesis.